About Me

Name: Dave in Nevada
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Big Fifty Caliber Rifles

I recently watched an episode of Lock and Load on the History Channel. The episode was hosted by retired Marine Gunnery Sergeant R. Lee Ermey.

This show confirmed a view that I have held for several years now which dispenses with the argument that the Second Amendment only applies to the type of firearms that were in existence at the time it was written and that the country’s founding fathers could not have imagined today’s modern firearms; that modern firearms are directly descended from the very first firearm.

I grant you that the founders probably didn’t conceive of the actual design of certain modern guns but they certainly were able to conceive of the concept. It is my understanding that the founders were highly educated and intelligent men, men who read and studied classical writings. Surely, then, these men were aware of Da Vinci’s multi-barrel cannon design.

However, to take this argument to the First Amendment, I seriously doubt that the founders ever conceived of the idea that news could be transmitted by radio, television or the internet. They probably never even thought of the telegraph. The science behind all of those things was unheard of at the time.

Further, consider that this piece was generated with a word processing program and stored on a computer. If the founders were faced with this document, would they have considered it to be “papers” which would be protected as a right under the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights? The Supreme Court of the United States does. I am quite certain that the founders would have been amazed at the technology but they would have been able to see the natural progression of quill & vellum to a WORD file when shown all of the intermediate advancements.

Most people today see that connection. Of this I am certain, because no one wants to ban my computer and printer as a weapon of mass communication that didn’t exist when the First Amendment was written.

Therefore, would the founders have been amazed to see a modern, semi-automatic rifle? No doubt they would but they probably would have seen the direct connection with the firearms of their day. Upon being handed an M-14 rifle, General George Washington would have immediately recognized it for what it was. He might even have been able to figure out what a typewriter was. On the other hand, what might he have thought of our current form of communication such as radio, television, the internet, a computer or even a telephone?

Just as society has advanced our technology from horses & buggies to automobiles, we have advanced our firearms technology.

However, the advancement in firearms technology has not been nearly as swift as other technology. For example, automobiles and airplanes have been in existence slightly more than one hundred years whereas firearms have been in existence for more than five hundred years and firearms improvement has been exceedingly limited.

If firearm advancement had been in line with other technological advancement, firearms would have been at the phaser (charged particle beam) stage by now.

As to the concept of the founders not being able to conceive of fifty caliber firearms, or even seen the need or value in them, click on the link below:

http://www.davekopel.org/NRO/2001/Guns-and-Character-Assassination.htm

Here, Dave Kopel has shown that many of the weapons of the founder’s day were fifty caliber or larger. I would be willing to wager that the founders would have marveled at our modern firearms design and development but they certainly would have been able to see the value in them. They would also have been able to see the natural progression from flintlock to cap lock to full-auto firearms, from muzzle loader to cartridge rifles, from single shot to semi-auto, just as they were able to see that same natural progression from fire-stick to matchlock to wheel lock to flintlock.

If we were to apply anti-gun group’s premise about firearms to the entire Bill of Rights we would have to do away with cars, trains and planes. We would be obliged to eliminate from society all forms of modern communication and printing methods including ball point pens.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »